HRR - Task - Evaluation of Crew-Centric Onboard Mission Operations Planning and Execution Tool

NASA Logo Human Research Roadmap HRP Exploration Data

Evidence Risks Gaps Tasks Reports

Explore Search

- HCI-03
  - HCI
- HSIA-101
  - HSIA
- HSIA-201
  - HSIA
- HSIA-401
  - HSIA
- HSIA-501
  - HSIA
- MPTASK-01
  - MPTASK
- MPTASK-03
  - MPTASK

Evaluation of Crew-Centric Onboard Mission Operations Planning and Execution Tool (Completed)

Last Published: 07/30/20 02:45:15 PM (Central)

Task Book: Entry
Principal Investigator: Hillenius, Steven

Short Title: Onboard Planning

Responsible HRP Element: Human Factors and Behavioral Performance

Collaborating Org(s):

Other:

Funding Status: Completed - Task completed and produced a deliverable

Procurement Mechanism(s):

Directed

Aims:

Aim 1: Support ISS Program evaluation of crew self-scheduling and plan execution through Playbook, providing a platform for future research on crew autonomy for deep space mission operations as well as an assessment of the potential for limited crew self-scheduling in more near-term ISS operations.

Aim 2: Provide Playbook as an operations tool to increase the realism and efficiency of the Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) and NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations (NEEMO) analogs.

Aim 3: Determine the appropriate level of information (e.g., constraints, plan complexity) required for crewmembers to schedule their time autonomously with limited ground support by unobtrusively (through automated software logging) gathering and analyzing Playbook use data.

Aim 4: Characterize task workload (e.g. time spent planning versus execution of plans, time on self-scheduled activities) of crewmembers completing and executing self-scheduling tasks by unobtrusively (through automated software logging) gathering and analyzing initial Playbook use data.

Resources (Ground Analog, Flight, Other)

Ground Analog Resources

Ground-Based Flight Analogs Controlled Research Analog, Short Duration (2 months or less) – isolated and confined with spaceflight mission scenario [e.g., HERA, NEEMO]
Number of Subjects	32

Flight Resources

Number of Subjects

Other Resources

Other Resources Needed?

Yes

Deliverables (1)

Category: Risk Characterization, Quantification
Subcategory: Evidence or Risk Characterization

Description:
Research report detailing findings that characterizes the effect of providing crew autonomy through onboard self-scheduling and plan execution, and provides proof-of-concept validation of unobtrusively gathering and analyzing data on task planning and execution.

Internal Customers:
Human Factors and Behavioral Performance
External Customers:
ISS/iSTAR

Is a Customer-Supplier Agreement (CSA) Required? Yes

Mappings

Risk of Adverse Outcome Due to Inadequate Human Systems Integration Architecture

HSIA-101: We need to identify the Human Systems Integration (HSI) – relevant crew health and performance outcomes, measures, and metrics, needed to characterize and mitigate risk, for future exploration missions.

HSIA-201: We need to evaluate the demands of future exploration habitat/vehicle systems and mission scenarios (e.g. increased automation, multi-modal communication) on individuals and teams, and determine the risks these demands pose to crew health and performance.

HSIA-401: We need to determine how HSI can be applied in the vehicle/habitat and computer interface Design Phase to mitigate potential decrements in operationally-relevant performance (e.g. problem-solving, execution procedures), during increasingly earth-independent, future exploration missions (including in-mission and at landing).

HSIA-501: We need to determine how HSI will be used in the development of dynamic and adaptive mission procedures and processes, to mitigate individual and team performance decrements during increasingly earth-independent, future exploration missions (including in-mission and at landing).

Evaluation of Crew-Centric Onboard Mission Operations Planning and Execution Tool

Related Tasks (110)

Print View...

PRRs (3)

NASA Developer: Daniel Febus Responsible NASA Official: Susan Torney Contact HRP for a 508 compliant PDF Budgets, Strategic Plans, and Accountability Reports Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act Information-Dissemination Policies and Inventories Freedom of Information Act President's Management Agenda Privacy Policy & Important Notices Inspector General Hotline Contact HRP Human Health and Performance DIR Johnson Space Center USA.gov ExpectMore.gov

Common Item(s)
	Risk of Adverse Outcome Due to Inadequate Human Systems Integration Architecture
	HSIA-201: We need to evaluate the demands of future exploration habitat/vehicle systems and mission scenarios (e.g. increased automation, multi-modal communication) on individuals and teams, and determine the risks these demands pose to crew health and performance.