HRR - Task - HCAAM: Crew Autonomy through Self-Scheduling: Guidelines for Crew Scheduling Performance Envelope and Mitigation Strategies

NASA Logo Human Research Roadmap HRP Exploration Data

Evidence Risks Gaps Tasks Reports

Explore Search

- HARI-02
  - HARI
- HCI-03
  - HCI
- HCI-06
  - HCI
- HSIA-101
  - HSIA
- HSIA-201
  - HSIA
- HSIA-401
  - HSIA
- HSIA-501
  - HSIA
- HSIA-701
  - HSIA
- MPTASK-01
  - MPTASK
- MPTASK-03
  - MPTASK
- Team Gap 6
  - Team
- Team-105
  - Team

HCAAM: Crew Autonomy through Self-Scheduling: Guidelines for Crew Scheduling Performance Envelope and Mitigation Strategies

Last Published: 07/30/20 02:45:15 PM (Central)

Task Book: Entry Unavailable
Principal Investigator: Marquez, Jessica

Short Title: Crew Autonomy through Self-Scheduling

Responsible HRP Element: Human Factors and Behavioral Performance

Collaborating Org(s):

Other:

Funding Status: Active - Currently funded and in progress

Procurement Mechanism(s):

Solicited

Aims:

This task is part of the Human Capabilities Assessments for Autonomous Missions (HCAAM) Virtual NASA Specialized Center of Research (VNSCOR) deliverable.

Aim 1: Quantify crew performance envelope for the task of self-scheduling spaceflight operational plans.
Aim 2: Develop countermeasures that mitigate deficient crew self-scheduling performance.
Aim 3: Validate self-scheduling countermeasures by evaluating changes in crew performance with countermeasures in spaceflight analogs.
Aim 4: Recommend standards and guidelines appropriate for autonomous crews in LDEMs with regards to self-scheduling.

Resources (Ground Analog)

Deliverables (1)

Category: Risk Characterization, Quantification
Subcategory: Evidence or Risk Characterization

Description:

Yearly reports, operational POL, validated countermeasure
Updated requirements and recommendations
Final report

Internal Customers:
Human Factors and Behavioral Performance
External Customers:
None

Mappings

Risk of Adverse Outcome Due to Inadequate Human Systems Integration Architecture

HSIA-101: We need to identify the Human Systems Integration (HSI) – relevant crew health and performance outcomes, measures, and metrics, needed to characterize and mitigate risk, for future exploration missions.

HSIA-201: We need to evaluate the demands of future exploration habitat/vehicle systems and mission scenarios (e.g. increased automation, multi-modal communication) on individuals and teams, and determine the risks these demands pose to crew health and performance.

HSIA-401: We need to determine how HSI can be applied in the vehicle/habitat and computer interface Design Phase to mitigate potential decrements in operationally-relevant performance (e.g. problem-solving, execution procedures), during increasingly earth-independent, future exploration missions (including in-mission and at landing).

HSIA-501: We need to determine how HSI will be used in the development of dynamic and adaptive mission procedures and processes, to mitigate individual and team performance decrements during increasingly earth-independent, future exploration missions (including in-mission and at landing).

HSIA-701: We need to determine how human-automation-robotic systems can be optimized for effective enhancement and monitoring of crew capabilities, health, and performance, during increasingly earth-independent, future exploration missions (including in-mission and at landing).

HCAAM: Crew Autonomy through Self-Scheduling: Guidelines for Crew Scheduling Performance Envelope and Mitigation Strategies

Risk of Performance and Behavioral Health Decrements Due to Inadequate Cooperation, Coordination, Communication, and Psychosocial Adaptation within a Team

Team-105: We need to identify a set of countermeasures to support team function and enable multiple distributed teams to manage shifting levels of autonomy for all phases of increasingly earth independent, long duration exploration missions.

HCAAM: Crew Autonomy through Self-Scheduling: Guidelines for Crew Scheduling Performance Envelope and Mitigation Strategies

Related Tasks (182)

Print View...

PRRs (5)

NASA Developer: Daniel Febus Responsible NASA Official: Susan Torney Contact HRP for a 508 compliant PDF Budgets, Strategic Plans, and Accountability Reports Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act Information-Dissemination Policies and Inventories Freedom of Information Act President's Management Agenda Privacy Policy & Important Notices Inspector General Hotline Contact HRP Human Health and Performance DIR Johnson Space Center USA.gov ExpectMore.gov

Ground-Based Flight Analogs Controlled Research Analog, Short Duration (2 months or less) – isolated and confined with spaceflight mission scenario [e.g., HERA, NEEMO]
Number of Subjects	16

Common Item(s)
	Risk of Adverse Outcome Due to Inadequate Human Systems Integration Architecture
	HSIA-201: We need to evaluate the demands of future exploration habitat/vehicle systems and mission scenarios (e.g. increased automation, multi-modal communication) on individuals and teams, and determine the risks these demands pose to crew health and performance.