HRR - Task - HCAAM: Using a Human Capabilities Framework to Quantify Crew Task Performance in Human-Robotic Systems

NASA Logo Human Research Roadmap HRP Exploration Data

Evidence MDRP Risks Gaps Tasks Reports

Explore Search

- HSIA-101
  - HSIA
- HSIA-201
  - HSIA
- HSIA-401
  - HSIA
- HSIA-501
  - HSIA

HCAAM: Using a Human Capabilities Framework to Quantify Crew Task Performance in Human-Robotic Systems

Last Published: 04/20/22 11:43:24 AM (Central)

Task Book: Entry
Principal Investigator: Fanchiang, Christine

Short Title: Crew Task Performance Quantification

Responsible HRP Element: Human Factors and Behavioral Performance

Collaborating Org(s):

Funding Status: Active - Currently funded and in progress

Procurement Mechanism(s):

Solicited

Aims:

This task is part of the Human Capabilities Assessments for Autonomous Missions (HCAAM) Virtual NASA Specialized Center of Research (VNSCOR) deliverable.The purpose of this task is to expand and validate a task-design framework through a series of experimental task scenarios where we track task performance with measures such as speed and accuracy of task execution as well as changes to human capabilities using biometric sensing as an inference for real time task performance.

Aim 1: Establish a framework for quantifying human-machine system performance evaluation
Aim 2: Develop non-invasive, physiological measures of crew capabilities
Aim 3: Develop reduced-order modeling of task performance
Aim 4: Establish an assessment methodology of human-machine performance using non-invasive physiological measures.

Resources (Ground Analog)

Deliverables (1)

Category: Risk Characterization, Quantification
Subcategory: Evidence or Risk Characterization

Description:

A vetted task-design framework to quantify human-machine system performance
Interim Definition Phase Report describing current status of research.
Final Report describing 1) Analysis of how certain physiological signatures may be indicative of task performance; 2) Analysis of how certain physiological signatures may be indicative of how humans interact with an autonomous system; and 3) Analysis of a reduced-order of measures that may be able to track task performance and human capability change in an operational fashion.

Internal Customers:
Human Factors and Behavioral Performance
External Customers:
None

Mappings

Risk of Adverse Outcomes Due to Inadequate Human Systems Integration Architecture

HSIA-101: We need to identify the Human Systems Integration (HSI) – relevant crew health and performance outcomes, measures, and metrics, needed to characterize and mitigate risk, for future exploration missions.

HSIA-201: We need to evaluate the demands of future exploration habitat/vehicle systems and mission scenarios (e.g. increased automation, multi-modal communication) on individuals and teams, and determine the risks these demands pose to crew health and performance.

HSIA-401: We need to determine how HSI can be applied in the vehicle/habitat and computer interface Design Phase to mitigate potential decrements in operationally-relevant performance (e.g. problem-solving, execution procedures), during increasingly earth-independent, future exploration missions (including in-mission and at landing).

HSIA-501: We need to determine how HSI will be used in the development of dynamic and adaptive mission procedures and processes, to mitigate individual and team performance decrements during increasingly earth-independent, future exploration missions (including in-mission and at landing).

HCAAM: Using a Human Capabilities Framework to Quantify Crew Task Performance in Human-Robotic Systems

Related Tasks (114)

Print View...

Risk Approach Plans (1)

NASA Developer: Daniel Febus Responsible NASA Official: Susan Torney Contact HRP for a 508 compliant PDF Budgets, Strategic Plans, and Accountability Reports Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act Information-Dissemination Policies and Inventories Freedom of Information Act President's Management Agenda Privacy Policy & Important Notices Inspector General Hotline Contact HRP Human Health and Performance DIR Johnson Space Center USA.gov ExpectMore.gov

Ground-Based Flight Analogs Controlled Research Analog, Short Duration (2 months or less) – isolated and confined with spaceflight mission scenario [e.g., HERA, NEEMO]
Number of Subjects	16

Common Item(s)
	Risk of Adverse Outcomes Due to Inadequate Human Systems Integration Architecture
	HSIA-201: We need to evaluate the demands of future exploration habitat/vehicle systems and mission scenarios (e.g. increased automation, multi-modal communication) on individuals and teams, and determine the risks these demands pose to crew health and performance.