HRR - Task - Investigation of Occupant Injury Risk in the Soyuz Vehicle and Comparison to Commercial Crew Designs

NASA Logo Human Research Roadmap HRP Exploration Data

Evidence MDRP Risks Gaps Tasks Reports

Explore Search

Investigation of Occupant Injury Risk in the Soyuz Vehicle and Comparison to Commercial Crew Designs

Last Published: 07/29/22 01:33:24 PM (Central)

Task Book: Entry
Principal Investigator: Stitzel, Joel

Short Title: Soyuz Impact Comparison to ComCrew

Responsible HRP Element: Human Factors and Behavioral Performance

Collaborating Org(s):

Funding Status: Active - Currently funded and in progress

Procurement Mechanism(s):

Solicited

Aims:

Identify expected injury risks associated with Soyuz nominal and off-nominal landing Scenarios.
Examine differences in injury risk to crew as a function of seat / restraint and loading combinations between Soyuz and modern vehicle designs.

Resources (None Listed)

Deliverables (3)

Category: Study Results
Subcategory:

Description:
Identification of injury risk to crewmembers during nominal and off-nominal landings in the Soyuz capsule.

Internal Customers:
Human Factors and Behavioral Performance
External Customers:
None

Category: Risk Characterization, Quantification
Subcategory: Evidence or Risk Characterization

Description:
Quantification of injury risk differences between Soyuz, Orion, Dragon2, and CST-100 in matched landing conditions.

Internal Customers:
Human Factors and Behavioral Performance
External Customers:
None

Category: Technology or Tool
Subcategory: Computational Models or Simulations

Description:
The work will produce validated analytical tools including a Soyuz seat finite element (FE) model with mid-size male human body FE models which can be used to verify occupant safety of crewmembers in impact conditions.

Internal Customers:
Human Factors and Behavioral Performance
External Customers:
None

Mappings

Risk of Injury from Dynamic Loads

DL-101: We do not understand the risk of injury associated with crewed vehicle landings and how this risk relates to the desired acceptable risk.

DL-301: We do not have an identified, validated and standardized approach for vehicle instrumentation and biodynamic data collection, and predictive analytic biodynamic modeling that would allow for specific risk injury prediction by mission-phase, crew functionality post-landing, and vehicle design.

DL-401: We do not know the extent to which multiple spaceflight hazards (e.g., spaceflight deconditioning, bone loss, radiation exposure, altered gravity) may interact to synergistically decrease injury tolerance for off-nominal dynamic landing loads, increasing risk to crew’s performance in mission-completing actions immediately after landing.

Investigation of Occupant Injury Risk in the Soyuz Vehicle and Comparison to Commercial Crew Designs

Related Tasks (15)

Print View...

Risk Approach Plans (1)

NASA Developer: Daniel Febus Responsible NASA Official: Susan Torney Contact HRP for a 508 compliant PDF Budgets, Strategic Plans, and Accountability Reports Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act Information-Dissemination Policies and Inventories Freedom of Information Act President's Management Agenda Privacy Policy & Important Notices Inspector General Hotline Contact HRP Human Health and Performance DIR Johnson Space Center USA.gov ExpectMore.gov

Common Item(s)
	Risk of Injury from Dynamic Loads
	DL-401: We do not know the extent to which multiple spaceflight hazards (e.g., spaceflight deconditioning, bone loss, radiation exposure, altered gravity) may interact to synergistically decrease injury tolerance for off-nominal dynamic landing loads, increasing risk to crew’s performance in mission-completing actions immediately after landing.